Legal Opinion

People v. Coryell

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 28, 2003No. E030693PublishedCited by 6 opinions

[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WARD, J.

Defendants and appellants Jason Lee Coryell and Telesforo Joseph Darden appeal after they were convicted of numerous assault, attempted murder, weapons discharge, and other crimes, arising out of a series of gang-related episodes. Defendant Coryell contends his convictions should be reversed because he was deprived of the constitutional right to a representative jury, and because the evidence is insufficient to sustain the charges. We reject these contentions and affirm the judgment as to defendant Coryell.

Defendant Darden raises claims of insufficient evidence, instructional…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. People v. SeatonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. StankewitzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  3. People v. OrtegaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  4. People v. NguyenCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  5. People v. HillCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2007
  2. People v. Jones CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. People v. Jones CA1/2California Court of Appeal · 2020
  4. People v. Markbreiter CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  5. People v. TousantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2021

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API