Shelby County Health Care Corp. v. Majestic Star Casino, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
1Concurring in the judgmentRogers, Circuit Judge
The district court should have used an arbitrary and capricious standard to review Majestic’s decision denying the claim at issue; however, Majestic’s decision was arbitrary and capricious and thus I concur in affirming the district court’s award of benefits and prejudgment interest to the Med.
I. Standard for Reviewing ERISA Fiduciaries and Their Agents
Majestic, as a fiduciary with discretionary authority to construe the terms of the Plan, is entitled to have its decisions reviewed under an arbitrary and capricious standard. This court should follow the well-reasoned approach set out by the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Firestone Tire & Rubber Co. v. BruchSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Pens. Plan Guide P 23922q Juanita Yeager v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Sharkey v. Ultramar Energy Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Kellogg v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- Geddes v. United Staffing Alliance Employee Medical PlanCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.