Legal Opinion

Watling v. Watling

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 18, 1928No. 4900, 4901PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

John A. Watling died testate in 1919, leaving a wife, Eunice W. Watling, a son, John W. Watling, and a daughter, Lucile Watling. After making some special devises and bequests, his will provided that the residue of his estate should be disposed of as follows: One-third to the son;, one-third to John W. Watling and William F. MeCorkle, in trust for the testator’s wife, with power in the trustees to manage, care for, invest, and reinvest the same, and with directions to pay the income therefrom, after paying the costs incident to the care of the estate, to the beneficiary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Sells v. DelgadoMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1904
  2. Keating v. KeatingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1917
  3. Greenwich Trust Co. v. ConverseSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1923
  4. Bull v. BullSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1830
  5. Thompson v. DennyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1922

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Scully v. ScullyNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Detroit Bank & Trust Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1971
  3. Watling v. WatlingCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API