Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Traction Co. v. Williams

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided May 25, 1926No. 19514PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court.

In this action the plaintiff sought damages for injuries sustained which he claimed to have resulted from the negligent operation of a street car of the Cincinnati Traction Company, which collided with the motor truck upon which he was riding. The trial resulted in a verdict and j'udgment for plaintiff, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals.

Concededly error was committed by the trial court in the general charge in three particulars.

The court defined negligence as follows: “Negligence is defined as the doing of what an ordinarily careful and prudent person would not have done…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Davis v. ZuckerOhio Court of Appeals · 1951
  2. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. DuraliaOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  3. Harig v. McCutcheonOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
  4. Cleveland Ry. Co. v. DurschukOhio Court of Appeals · 1928
  5. Franklin Motor Car Co. v. DyerOhio Court of Appeals · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API