Legal Opinion

Osborne v. Massachusetts Bonding and Insurance Company

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided March 17, 1964No. Civ. 3943PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KILKENNY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs’ challenge to the right of Massachusetts Bonding to maintain an action on the indemnity agreements between the parties is premised on the failure of Massachusetts to- obtain a license from the Corporation Commission under Article XIV, § 17 1 of the Constitution of that State, A.R.S. Historically, the regulation of insurance corporations in the State of Arizona has been controlled by the Corporation Commission mentioned in Article XV, § 5 2 and in said Article XIV, § 17.

Arizona R.S.1913, 3 § 3377, provided among other things, that the Corporation Commission…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Ford Motor Co. v. Department of TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. United States v. Republic Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United States v. Atlantic Refining Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1959
  4. City of Phoenix v. YatesArizona Supreme Court · 1949
  5. Cosper v. the Valley BankArizona Supreme Court · 1925

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Selective Life Insurance v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  2. Hofmann Company v. MeisnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  3. Depinto v. Provident Security Life Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  4. Arizona Corporation Commission v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Davis v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API