General Contract Purchase Corp. v. Barrow

The issue in -this case is between the intervener and the plaintiff. The suit originated in a foreclosure proceeding brought by the plaintiff on a chattel mortgage bearing on a Chrysler automobile which was seized while in the possession of the intervener, T. A. Jackson. The latter claims that the sale under which the pretended mortgage arose, was never completed for lack of delivery of the car to the defendant, Barrow, and consequently the mortgage rights did not attach. The issue seems to hinge on the question of delivery. Evidently the trial judge concluded that there must not have been a…