Legal Opinion

Guy v. Doak

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 7, 1891PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Motion for Rehearing.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

This case was decided by this court on June 6,1891. A motion for a rehearing was in due time filed and afterward presented to the court, and we shall now proceed to dispose of the same. It appears that some time in April, (about the 19th,) 1888, A. E. Guy was appointed by the judge of the district court in the supposed or intended case of Ott & Tewksbury et al. v. D. P. Doak, J. H. Allen, and A. P. Allen, et al., a receiver to take charge of the estate and property of said Allen & Allen. At that time, however, *367no such case had any…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Cohen v. TrowbridgeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  2. Hall v. JennessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1870
  3. Wolfley v. RisingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ball v. Red Square Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1923
  2. George R. Barse Live Stock Commission Co. v. AdamsCourt Of Appeals Of Indian Territory · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API