Sneed v. Burress
Kentucky Supreme Court
1ConcurrenceHughes, J.
I agree completely with the Court’s conclusion that the declaration of a mistrial in this case was not an abuse .of the trial court’s discretion. I write separately in hopes that a fuller account of the trial court’s proceedings and this Court’s standard of review will serve as a response to the concerns raised by the dissent.
RELEVANT FACTS
Near the outset of her opening statement, counsel for Sneed explained to the jury that the defendant denied the sex-offense allegations that had been leveled against him and contended that the alleged victim, the defendant’s granddaughter, had fabricated…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Arizona v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- United States v. PerezSupreme Court of the United States · 1824
- United States v. DinitzSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Commonwealth v. BarrosoKentucky Supreme Court · 2003
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.