Davis v. Curtis
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Jones District Court. This is a proceeding under the statute by which the plaintiffs seek to permanently establish the lines and corners of certain lands, which corners are alleged to be lost, destroyed and in dispute. The defendants resisted the proceeding, and objected to the appointment of' a commissioner.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Jones District Court. This is a proceeding under the statute by which the plaintiffs seek to permanently establish the lines and corners of certain lands, which corners are alleged to be lost, destroyed and in dispute. The defendants resisted the proceeding, and objected to the appointment of' a commissioner. The district court appointed three commissioners, and they made a majority and a minority report, which were set aside, and the matter was remanded to the same commissioners. Addir tional evidence was taken, and a second majority and minority report were filed. The majority…
1Opinion of the CourtEotiirock, J.
1. boo>t»v-e/tabus'i'iost0 pea!?evi-p cleuce: bill of exceptions. ' I. The abstract of appellants purports''to bean abstract of all the evidence taken before the cotnmissioners an(i filed with their report. Counsel for appellees seek to dispose of the appeal by filing an additional abstract setting out a bill of excep- . , . ° 1 tions, and they claim that the evidence was not properly made of record. It is a sufficient answer in reply to this position to say that no bill of exceptions was neces-sary. Section 3 of the act authorizing this proceeding requires that the evidence, plat and survey…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Burdick v. HeivlySupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
3Cited by6 opinions
- Johnson v. TrumpSupreme Court of Iowa · 1913
- Williams v. TschantzSupreme Court of Iowa · 1893
- Crismon v. DeckSupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Cuthbertson v. LockeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1886
- Plank v. ReinhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1890
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.