Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Spangler

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided July 8, 2016No. 2014AP002633-DPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review a report and supplemental report filed by referee James R. Erickson recommending that Attorney William J. Spangler's license to practice law in Wisconsin be suspended for 60 days for seven counts of professional misconduct involving two client matters. The referee also recommends that Attorney Spangler pay the full costs of the proceeding, which are $6,678.43 as of March 29, 2016.

¶ 2. Upon careful review of the matter, we adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law. We conclude, however, that rather than the 60-day suspension stipulated by the parties and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against EisenbergWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
  3. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against FitzgeraldWisconsin Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against MauchWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. James Elvin LagroneWisconsin Supreme Court · 2016
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Michael D. PetersenWisconsin Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. SpanglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  4. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. SpanglerWisconsin Supreme Court · 2021
  5. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Beth M. BantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API