Legal Opinion
EMED Technologies Corporation v. Repro-Med Systems, Inc. d/b/a RMS Medical Products
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 4, 2019No. 1:18-cv-05880Unknown
1Opinion
USDC SDNY DOCUMENT UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT ELECTRONICALLY FILED SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK DOC #: neem X DATE FILED:.6/4/2019 EMED TECHNOLOGIES CORP., : Plaintiff, : : 18 Civ. 5880 (LGS) -against- : : OPINION AND ORDER REPRO-MED. SYSTEMS, INC., : Defendant. : LORNA G. SCHOFIELD, District Judge: Plaintiff EMED Technologies (‘EMED”) alleges that Defendant Repro-Med Systems, Inc. (“RMS”) infringed United States Patent No. 9,808,576 (the “576 Patent’), titled “Devices and Methods for Protecting a User from a Sharp Tip of a Medical Needle.” The ‘576 patent relates to a device that sheaths…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Nautilus, Inc. v. Biosig Instruments, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2014
- Rhodia Chimie & Rhodia, Inc. v. PPG Industries Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.