Legal Opinion

Phoenix Recovery Group, Inc. v. Mehta

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 12, 2008No. A08A0435PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUFFIN, Presiding Judge.

The sole issue for determination on appeal in this matter is whether an action on a debt arising from a credit card account is governed by the six-year statute of limitation for an action on a contract, OCGA § 9-3-24, or the four-year statute of limitation for an action on an open account, OCGA § 9-3-25. Because we agree with the appellant, Phoenix Recovery Group, Inc. (“Phoenix”), that the applicable statute of limitation is that for an action on a contract, we reverse.

The parties stipulated to the facts below. Sharadkumar C. Mehta (“Mehta”) signed an application for…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Leachman v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2007
  2. Hill v. American ExpressCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Murray v. DeKALB FARMERS MARKET, INC.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  2. In Re BrownUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Arkansas · 2009
  3. Campbell v. CGMDistrict Court, D. New Hampshire · 2017
  4. Collier v. American Express Centurion BankCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  5. HENRY v. STRATEGIC EXCHANGE, LLC Et Al.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2017

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API