Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Nader v. Maine Democratic Party

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided April 19, 2012No. Docket: Was-10-678Published

1Concurrence

SILVER, J., with whom JABAR, J., joins,

concurring.

[¶ 40] I concur in the result reached by the majority in this case, and with the Court’s decision to reallocate and lower the burdens applicable in anti-SLAPP cases in order to restore balance to the competing constitutional rights implicated by this statute. I write separately because Maine’s anti-SLAPP statute raises serious concerns regarding the right to equal protection under the law, to petition the gov*564ernment for redress of grievances, and to open courts. I also write to express my belief that in order to avoid the potentially fatal…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Duracraft Corp. v. Holmes Products Corp.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1998
  2. Godin v. SchencksCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2010
  3. Irish v. GimbelSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997
  4. Dixon v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  5. Choroszy v. TsoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1994

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API