State v. Tyler
Ohio Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Harsha, Presiding Judge.
{¶ 1} Jacob Tyler appeals his convictions for aggravated robbery and aggravated burglary. Tyler presents various arguments concerning a recording of a phone call made from the Ross County jail to the victim after his arrest. First, Tyler argues that the state failed to authenticate the recording. Although the state’s effort at authentication was minimal at best, we hold that no abuse of discretion occurred in its admission. The victim testified that she received a call to her cell phone on a specific date and identified the caller as Tyler. And a deputy at the jail…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State v. ThompkinsOhio Supreme Court · 1997
- State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- State v. DehassOhio Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. AdamsOhio Supreme Court · 1980
- State v. ConwayOhio Supreme Court · 2006
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by24 opinions
- State v. LongOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
- State v. BellOhio Court of Appeals · 2019
- State v. BrownOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
- State v. ShepherdOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
- State v. ThompsonOhio Court of Appeals · 2012
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.