Legal Opinion

The Northern No. 30

District Court, E.D. North Carolina

Decided March 14, 1928PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEEKINS, District Judge.

This is a cause in admiralty, and the only question presented was the right of the libelant, a corporation, to recover contribution in general average. The law of general average is a part of the law of the sea, as distinguished from the law of the land. Perhaps the necessity for such distinction was that there are all shades of ferocity in the vast and cunning sea which Jean Bart called “the great brute.” It’s the claw’s scratch with intervals of velvet pawing. It’s never fiercer— the sea — than when a pond, a pool of liquid lead. Gloomy immobility: the prelude to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ralli v. TroopSupreme Court of the United States · 1895

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. A. C. Monk & Co. v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1931
  2. Maloy v. Moran Towing & Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  3. Maloy v. Moran Towing & Transp. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. The Moran No. 16District Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API