Legal Opinion
Hydro-Line Manufacturing Co. v. Pulido
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District
Decided May 24, 1984No. 13-83-388-CVPublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KENNEDY, Justice.
This suit arises from an alleged breach of contract, a joint venture agreement. Defendant/appellant, Hydro-Line, a manu facturer of hydraulic and pneumatic cylinders, joint ventured with plaintiff/appellee, Alcocer. 1
STATEMENT OF FACTS
The relationship began on May 17, 1982. Prior to May 17th, Alcocer worked for the Mexico City firm Hydro-Tee, a joint venture of which Hydro-Line was a member. In the spring of 1982, Hydro-Tec was dissolved. Hydro-Line began exploring various alternatives for selling hydraulic cylinders in Mexico. The options explored included the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Bendalin v. DelgadoTexas Supreme Court · 1966
- Board of Insurance Commissioners v. Great Southern Life InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Trust Co., Indp. Exctr. v. BauereisenTexas Supreme Court · 1938
- Anderson v. McRaeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1973
- Wenk v. City National BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Arroyo Shrimp Farm, Inc. v. Hung Shrimp Farm, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1996
- Hernandez v. Bexar County National Bank of San Antonio, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1986
- Shindler v. Marr & Associates, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1985
- Seal v. KnorppCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1992
- Olivares v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1985
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.