Legal Opinion

Divella v. Hurst

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 27, 1958No. 57-319PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a jury verdict for the defendant in an action arising out of a collision at a street intersection. Appellants point out that as to the plaintiff-wife, who was a passenger in her husband’s car, the verdict could stand only if there is evidence in the record from which the jury could have found that the negligence of the plaintiff-husband was the sole proximate cause of the accident. We conclude from a careful examination of the record that the jury could have found that the plaintiffs simply failed to prove negligence on the part of anyone.

The judgment is affirmed upon…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Stoddard, Et Ux.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Re-Mark Chemical Co. v. RossDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API