Legal Opinion

Veyo Concrete Products, Inc. v. Industrial Commission

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 20, 1985No. 19272PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ZIMMERMAN, Justice:

This is an appeal by Veyo Concrete, the employer of the injured party, and the State Insurance Fund, Veyo’s insurer (hereinafter jointly referred to as “appellants”), from an order of the Industrial Commission refusing to direct the Second Injury Fund (the “Fund”) to reimburse appellants for a proportion of the medical expenses and temporary total disability payments made to the injured employee following an injury he suffered while working for Veyo. We reverse the Commission’s order.

Because the injured employee is not an active party to this appeal and the only issue…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Intermountain Smelting Corp. v. CapitanoUtah Supreme Court · 1980
  2. American Coal Co. v. SandstromUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  3. Kaiser Steel Corp. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  4. Second Injury Fund v. Streator ChevroletUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Day's Market, Inc. v. MuirUtah Supreme Court · 1983

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Kerans v. Industrial Com'n of State of UtahUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Rex E. Lantham Co. v. Industrial CommissionUtah Supreme Court · 1986
  3. Otvos v. Industrial Com'n of UtahCourt of Appeals of Utah · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API