Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Ehredt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 28, 1978No. 36PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The six Judges who decided this appeal being equally divided, the judgment of sentence is affirmed.

JACOBS, President Judge, files an opinion in support of affirmance in which CERCONE and VAN der VOORT, JJ., join. SPAETH, J., files a dissenting opinion and HOFFMAN, J., joins in Part I of SPAETH’s, J., opinion. PRICE, J., dissents and would discharge because appellant was not timely tried under Pa.R.Crim.P. 1100. WATKINS, former President Judge, did not participate in the consideration or decision of this case.

OPINION IN SUPPORT OF AFFIRMANCE

JACOBS, President Judge:

On July 9,1975, appellant Ted…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Commonwealth v. SheltonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  4. Commonwealth v. MayfieldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976
  5. Commonwealth v. SimmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EhredtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  2. Commonwealth v. BullingSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Commonwealth v. SinorSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Commonwealth v. BayaniSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API