Legal Opinion
Metropolitan Club, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 11, 1950Published
1Per curiam
The record does not present a proper case for the intervention of a court of equity. The reasonableness of the time fixed for the discontinuance of temporary direct current service, as well as the reasonableness of the extension sought by plaintiff, are matters to be determined by the Public Service Commission in the first instance. (Matter of Leitner v. New York Tel. Co., 277 N. Y. 180; Murray v. New York Tel. Co., 170 App. Div. 17, affd. 226 N. Y. 590; Metzger v. New York State Rys., 168 App. Div. 187; Ten Ten Lincoln Place, Inc., v. Consolidated Edison Co., 190 Misc. 174, affd. 273 App.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Matter of Leitner v. New York Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Earl Carroll Realty Corp. v. New York Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1931
- Murray v. New York Telephone Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1915
- Murray v. . New York Telephone CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1919
- Ten Ten Lincoln Place, Inc. v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Supreme Court · 1947
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.