Sergeant v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
NARICK, Senior Judge.
Harral Sergeant (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (WCAB) that affirmed the Workers’ Compensation Judge’s (WCJ) modification and suspension of Claimant’s benefits. We affirm.
On June 26, 1992, Claimant, while employed with Interim Personnel (Employer), sustained a work-related injury.1 On November 29, 1993, Employer filed a petition to terminate and/or modify Claimant’s compensation, alleging that Claimant had fully recovered, work was available to him, but that Claimant had not acted in good faith by failing to take the job that…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Kachinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
- Snyder v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
- Kope v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
- Oshinski v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3Cited by1 opinion
- L. Zhang v. WCAB (Penn State Milton S. Hershey MC and Inservco Ins. Svcs.)Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2015