Legal Opinion
LUPO, LLC v. Reynolds and Reynolds Co.
District Court, D. Maine
Decided July 22, 2010No. 2:10-cr-00059Published
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTION TO STAY PROCEEDINGS AND COMPEL ARBITRATION
GEORGE Z. SINGAL, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion to Stay Proceedings and Compel Arbitration with Incorporated Memorandum of Law (Docket # 15) by Defendant The Reynolds and Reynolds Company. As explained herein, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s Motion.
I. BACKGROUND
For purposes of deciding this motion, the Court will not address the merits of— and therefore need not detail the specifics of — the dispute between the parties. Of relevance here, Plaintiffs Lupo, LLC d/b/a/ Prime Toyota, Bensol, LLC d/b/a/ Prime Nissan, Staretz,…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Volt Info. Sciences, Inc. v. Bd. of Trustees of Leland Stanford Jr. U.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Prima Paint Corp. v. Flood & Conklin Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Intergen N v. v. GrinaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2003
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.