Legal Opinion

Pearlman v. Pearlman

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided November 23, 1970No. 54198PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy

This is a post-divorce decree proceeding. Upon the petition of defendant, David Pearlman, and based upon a written stipulation of agreed facts and memorandums submitted by both parties, the trial court entered an order which reduced the divorce decree alimony award of $200 a month to $100 a month. The plaintiff-respondent, Lorain Pearlman, appeals from the order, contending that the trial court abused its discretion in reducing the alimony award.

The stipulation of the agreed facts on which the court acted is as follows:

“1. The Decree of Divorce was entered in the above entitled cause on March…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Herrick v. HerrickIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. Gregory v. GregoryAppellate Court of Illinois · 1964
  3. Maginnis v. MaginnisIllinois Supreme Court · 1926
  4. Arnold v. ArnoldAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  5. Gaines v. GainesAppellate Court of Illinois · 1969

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Baker v. BakerAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  2. Bowman v. BowmanAppellate Court of Illinois · 1973
  3. Barrow v. BarrowAppellate Court of Illinois · 1975
  4. Shellene v. ShelleneAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
  5. In re Marriage of ArvinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API