Lacaze v. Hardee

Counsel for appellees earnestly strives to convince us that we erred in holding that the application for rehearing was filed one day late, and, therefore, could not be considered.

The identical point raised by counsel was rather maturely considered and passed on by this Court in McCollister v. Police Jury of Sabine Parish, La.App., 197 So. 661. The facts of the two cases are identical.

Judgment in the present case was rendered here on June 18th. A copy of the opinion and decree was on that day mailed to appellees' counsel and was received by him the next day. Application for rehearing was filed…