Legal Opinion

Hubbell v. State

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided September 5, 2001No. 03S00-9912-CR-714PublishedCited by 47 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOEHM, Justice.

Jason Hubbell was convicted of murder and criminal confinement and sentenced to seventy-five years imprisonment. In this direct appeal, he raises ten issues, which we restate as eight. Hubbell contends: (1) the trial court erred by not dismissing the grand jury's indictment; (2) evidence of the location of the victim's body and cellular phone calls violated the alibi statute; (8) the trial court abused its discretion in admitting physical and testimonial evidence; (4) the admissions of his post-polygraph statements violated his right to cross-examine witnesses; (5) the trial…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. Delaware v. Van ArsdallSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  5. Stovall v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1967

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by47 opinions

  1. Michael Inman v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2014
  2. Summer Snow v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court · 2017
  3. Lyles v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Oldham v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2002
  5. Myers v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2008

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API