Legal Opinion

Jennings, Beale & Co. v. Beale

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Armstrong County

Decided January 4, 1892No. Nos. 153, 273PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Nos. 153, 273 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 69 March Term 1888, C. P. On December 23, 1887, Jennings, Beale & Co., Limited, B. F. Jennings, and John Davis filed a bill in equity against Joseph G. Beale, praying upon the facts therein averred that the defendant be restrained from interfering in any manner with the business and works of said association, or of any of its legally constituted officers, or from acting or claiming to act in any way as…

Read the full summary

Nos. 153, 273 October Term 1891, Sup. Ct.; court below, No. 69 March Term 1888, C. P. On December 23, 1887, Jennings, Beale & Co., Limited, B. F. Jennings, and John Davis filed a bill in equity against Joseph G. Beale, praying upon the facts therein averred that the defendant be restrained from interfering in any manner with the business and works of said association, or of any of its legally constituted officers, or from acting or claiming to act in any way as superintendent of manufacturing for said association. On January 6, 1888, a preliminary injunction moved for was refused. On April…

1Opinion of the Court

Pee Curiam :

The decree of the court below does not appear to have been satisfactory to either party, as both have appealed. We think the court was right in sustaining the master. The case was properly decided.

The decree is affirmed upon each appeal, and the appeals dismissed at the costs of the respective appellants.

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Resignation of Public Officials, Pennsylvania Department of Justice1938
  2. Rosenberg v. Nathan Benjamin, Inc., Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API