Legal Opinion

Gibson v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 18, 2013No. 4D12-4221PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING

2Per curiam

By order, we granted appellant’s motion for rehearing and withdrew our May 1, 2013 opinion. We reverse and remand for further proceedings. The trial court erred in summarily denying appellant’s facially sufficient motion for postconviction relief without explanation and without attachments. Terry v. State, 970 So.2d 863 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Dieudonne v. State, 958 So.2d 516 (Fla. 4th DCA 2007); Anderson v. State, 627 So.2d 1170 (Fla.1993).

The State’s argument that the motion does not satisfy the pleading requirements of Alcorn v. State, 121 So.3d 419 (Fla.2013), may be…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Alcorn v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2013
  2. Anderson v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993
  3. Dieudonne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007
  4. Terry v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2007

4Cited by2 opinions

  1. Herman Gibson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2014
  2. Massaro v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API