In re Thrall
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Appeal from special term, New York county. Appeal by Mary J. Thrall, wife of Edwin A. Thrall, from so much of an order, made in the matter of the assignment of Edwin A. Thrall to Adolph Ludeke, as denies appellant’s application to compel the assignee for the benefit of the creditors of said Edwin A. Thrall to pay to appellant the sum of $950, alimony pendente lite, claimed to be due to her under an order made July 31, 1894, in an action by her against Edwin A. Thrall for…
Read the full summary
Appeal from special term, New York county. Appeal by Mary J. Thrall, wife of Edwin A. Thrall, from so much of an order, made in the matter of the assignment of Edwin A. Thrall to Adolph Ludeke, as denies appellant’s application to compel the assignee for the benefit of the creditors of said Edwin A. Thrall to pay to appellant the sum of $950, alimony pendente lite, claimed to be due to her under an order made July 31, 1894, in an action by her against Edwin A. Thrall for separation.
1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.
It appears that on the 12th of June, 1891, the appellant brought an action against her husband, Edwin A. Thrall, in the supreme court, the venue being laid in the county of Kings, to obtain a separation from her husband, upon the ground of cruel and inhuman treatment. The defendant in said action duly appeared, and such proceedings were had that on the 31st of July, 1894, an order was made in said action allowing the appellant herein the sum of $50 a week for her support and maintenance for and during each week from the 12th of May, 1894, until the final termination of the action or the…
2Cited by5 opinions
- Duss v. DussSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Maddox v. MaddoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1964
- Jacobson v. JacobsonCity of New York Municipal Court · 1914
- Paul v. PaulSupreme Court of Kansas · 1926
- Wiley v. WileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960