Legal Opinion

Diepenhorst v. General Electric Co.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided January 21, 1971No. Docket 8616PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtR. B. Burns, J.

The Michigan Employment Security Commission, pursuant to section 29(1) (b) of the employment security act (MCLA 1970 Cum Supp §421.29 [Stat Ann 1968 Rev §17.531]), disqualified plaintiff from receiving unemployment compensation after determining that plaintiff was discharged from her employment for misconduct. Reviewing and then affirming the commission’s finding the trial court stated:

“We cannot disagree with the finding of the referee and the majority of the appeal board that claimant’s conduct constitutes misconduct in connection with her employment for which she was discharged. The…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Wickey v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Fresta v. MillerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1967
  3. Villella v. Employment Security CommissionMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Farmers State Bank v. Department of Commerce, Financial Institutions BureauMichigan Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. Mississippi Emp. SEC. v. McLane-SouthernMississippi Supreme Court · 1991
  3. King v. Calumet & Hecla Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  4. Union Bank & Trust Co. v. First Michigan Bank & Trust Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  5. Gunderson v. Rose Hill RealtyMichigan Court of Appeals · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API