Legal Opinion
In re the Arbitration between Spychalski & Utica Mutual Insurance
New York Supreme Court
Decided September 22, 1976PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMarshall E. Livingston, J.
This is a motion by Continental to permanently stay arbitration. Petitioner then cross-moved for an order compelling respondent Continental to arbitrate.
The hit-and-run accident out of which this claim arose occurred on September 21, 1975. Claimant was getting into a car owned and operated by John Giles when its left rear door was struck by the hit-and-run vehicle, and petitioner Spychalski was injured.
Mr. Giles was insured by Utica Mutual Insurance Company, and Mr. Spychalski was insured by respondent, Continental. Claims were made by Mr. Spychalski against both carriers under the respective…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1968
- In re the Arbitration between Jonathan Logan, Inc. & Stillwater Worsted Mills, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1969
- Neals v. Allstate InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
- In re the Arbitration between General Accident Fire & Life Assurance Corp. & CerrettoNew York Supreme Court · 1969
3Cited by5 opinions
- Sisson v. Travelers InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- In re the Arbitration between Nationwide Mutual Insurance & MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- Rifkin v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNew York Supreme Court · 1993
- Sission v. Travelers Insurance CompaniesNew York Supreme Court · 1982
- In re the Arbitration between Spychalski & Continental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1977