Legal Opinion

Brodlieb v. Brodlieb

New York Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1961PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJoseph A. Suozzi, J.

Defendant moves for renewal and reargument of his motion to dismiss the complaint herein under subdivision 4 of rule 107 of the Rules of Civil Practice which was decided with plaintiff’s motion for counsel fees. This motion to renew is granted, and upon the reargument the court renders this decision in lieu and in place of its original decision of August 8,1961.

The plaintiff has brought an action to annul and declare void a marriage contracted with the defendant, and the plaintiff wife seeks alimony therein. Plaintiff moves for a counsel fee, and defendant moves under subdivision 4 of rule…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dravecka v. RichardNew York Court of Appeals · 1935
  2. Pettit v. PettitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1905
  3. Stein v. . DunneNew York Court of Appeals · 1907
  4. Stein v. DunneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1907
  5. Shenker v. ShenkerNew York Supreme Court · 1958

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Puffer v. City of BinghamtonNew York Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Rashkov v. RashkovNew York Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Opn. No., New York Attorney General Reports1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API