Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Wachowski v. Beke

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided October 11, 2001No. 64A03-0104-JV-120Published

1ConcurrenceRobb, Judge

I fully concur with the majority opinion, but write separately to address a means which may prevent an inequitable final resolution of this case and protect the "best interest" of M.G.S. After reviewing the facts and cireumstances of this case, I believe that the appointment of a guardian ad litem to represent M.G.S.'s interests at the adoption proceeding would be highly appropriate. Under Indiana Code section 29-3-2-3(a), the court must appoint a guardian ad litem to represent the interests of a minor "if the court determines that the ... minor is not represented or is not adequately…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Crayne v. M. K. R. L.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1980

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API