Legal Opinion
Abraham Solomon v. Downtowner of Tulsa, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 14, 1966No. 8177PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHRISTENSEN, District Judge.
In the exercise of diversity jurisdiction, the trial court, sitting without a jury, denied recovery to the plaintiff-appellant Abraham Solomon against the defendant-respondent motel for loss of jewelry taken by someone from a car which had been left by plaintiff in the parking lot of the motel. Asserting that the court erred in concluding that the notice provision of the Innkeeper’s Act of the State of Oklahoma, 1 2 as well as his own negligence, precluded recovery of damages, plaintiff has taken this appeal.
The facts are without substantial dispute :
The plaintiff,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Temple Hoyne Buell v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Shiman Bros. & Co. v. Nebraska National Hotel Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1943
- F & S Construction Company, an Arizona Corporation v. Emil Berube and Ellen BerubeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1963
- Koch v. Oklahoma Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- United States Fidelity and Guaranty Company, a Maryland Corporation v. Henry H. Lembke, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1964
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jamaica Time Petroleum, Inc. v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1966
- Kalpakian v. Oklahoma Sheraton Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1968
- Vilella v. Sabine, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
- Gary Rawson v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.