Truglia v. Truglia
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
“Modifications of pendente lite awards should rarely be made by an appellate court and then only under exigent circumstances, such as where a party is unable to meet his or her financial obligations, or justice otherwise requires” (Palmeri v Palmeri, 87 AD3d 572, 573 [2011] [internal quotation marks omitted]; see Renga v Renga, 86 AD3d 634, 635 [2011]). “Any perceived inequities in pendente lite support can best be remedied by a speedy trial, at which the parties’ financial circumstances can be fully explored” (Conyea v Conyea, 81 AD3d 869, 870 [2011]; see Renga v Renga, 86 AD3d at 635; Malik…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Palmeri v. PalmeriAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Conyea v. ConyeaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Levy v. LevyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Dowd v. DowdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Malik v. MalikAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Trajkovic v. TrajkovicAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- Pappas v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fratello v. FratelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Fratello v. FratelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Pappas v. PappasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.