Legal Opinion

Marre v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided November 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

APPEAL from Pulaski Circuit Court. Hon. J. W. Martin, Circuit Judge. There-was no written affidavit, and no crime charged with sufficient certainty. Argued upon the transcript and evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtEnglish, C. J.

The appellant, Angelo Marre, was prosecuted, convicted, and fined $10, before Justice Howe, of Little Rock, for Sabbath-breaking; appealed to the circuit court Of Pulaski county, where he was again tried by jury; found guilty; fined $10; filed motions in arrest of judgment, and for a new trial, which were overruled, and he took a bill of exceptions, and appealed to this court.

The transcript of Justice Howe, filed in the circuit court, on appeal to that court, shows, that on the ninth of June, 1879, Thomas C. Trimble, prosecuting attorney, appeared before him, and,’ by affidavit, charged…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  2. Monastakes v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1924
  3. Strickbine v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1941
  4. Wilson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API