Legal Opinion

Jolly v. Jolly

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 16, 1976No. 51807PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Deen, Presiding Judge.

The jury’s verdict was for the return of "the boat.” The judgment was for the boat, motor and trailer. Under Code § 110-301 the judgment shall conform to the verdict. Under Code § 110-105 verdicts are to have a "reasonable construction.” Thus the question for resolution is whether a verdict for "the boat” may be reasonably construed so as to result in a judgment for the boat, motor and trailer.

The first problem is whether such a construction may turn to elements outside the terms of the verdict or is limited to those terms. Where a verdict is plain and unmistakable in…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Seifert v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
  2. Giles v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
  3. Howard v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
  4. Harvey v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
  5. Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. RapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Patterson v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
  3. Nations v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
  4. City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API