Jolly v. Jolly
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Deen, Presiding Judge.
The jury’s verdict was for the return of "the boat.” The judgment was for the boat, motor and trailer. Under Code § 110-301 the judgment shall conform to the verdict. Under Code § 110-105 verdicts are to have a "reasonable construction.” Thus the question for resolution is whether a verdict for "the boat” may be reasonably construed so as to result in a judgment for the boat, motor and trailer.
The first problem is whether such a construction may turn to elements outside the terms of the verdict or is limited to those terms. Where a verdict is plain and unmistakable in…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Seifert v. HoltSupreme Court of Georgia · 1889
- Giles v. SpinksSupreme Court of Georgia · 1879
- Howard v. BarrettSupreme Court of Georgia · 1874
- Harvey v. HeadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1881
- Ready-Mix Concrete Co. v. RapeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1958
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Patterson v. LogginsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1977
- Nations v. WinterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1983
- City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988