Legal Opinion

United States v. Eddie Argitakos and Christos Potamitis

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided November 30, 1988No. 283, Docket 88-1274PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Section 212(a)(2) of the Sentencing Reform Act of 1984 (“SRA”), 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (Supp. IV 1986), provides for a reduction of sentence for defendants whose original sentence was based on a sentencing range that has subsequently been lowered by the Sentencing Commission. This appeal presents the question of whether that Section authorizes the reduction of a sentence imposed on a defendant for offenses committed before the pertinent provisions of the SRA took effect. Because the Sentencing Act of 1987, Pub.L. No. 100-182 (Dec. 7, 1987), 101 Stat. 1266, provides that the SRA applies only to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. United States v. Christos Potamitis, Eddie Argitakos, and Steve ArgitakosCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  2. United States v. AbbenanteDistrict Court, D. Rhode Island · 1988
  3. United States v. PotamitisDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1985

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. United States v. Tyrone Perez, Also Known as Larry, Also Known as StarkyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. Jean Eddy Charleus and Jean Michel Louis, Jean Eddy CharleusCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
  3. United States v. Rajan GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
  4. United States v. Jeffrey Shane WatsonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989
  5. United States v. Ronald Walter Hayes, SrCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API