Legal Opinion

Borough of Williamsburg v. Bottenfield

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 26, 1926No. Appeal 256PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Keller, J.,

The learned court below struck off so much of the plaintiff borough’s municipal claim as was filed against the defendant’s land lying outside the borough. We affirm the order but for a different reason than that assigned by the court below.

The lien was filed to collect the cost of paving and curbing certain parts of High and Union Streets, by an equal assessment on the foot front, from the owners of real estate abutting on the improvement. High Street is entirely within the borough but forms the dividing line between the borough and Woodbury Township, and the lien…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. HarrisonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1891
  2. Marston v. HumesWashington Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Commonwealth ex rel. Attorney General v. SnyderSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
  4. Larned v. TiernanIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
  5. Stevens v. Lake George & Muskegon River RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. EvansSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  2. Upper Moreland-Hatboro Joint Sewer Authority v. PearsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  3. Lancaster City Annexation CaseSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
  4. Commonwealth v. SolleySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956
  5. Kolesar v. Slovak Evangelical UnionSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1936

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API