Legal Opinion

Emond v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided March 15, 1995No. 93-04060PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

652 So.2d 419 (1995)

Rafe EMOND, Appellant,

v.

STATE of Florida, Appellee.

No. 93-04060.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Second District.

March 15, 1995.

James Marion Moorman, Public Defender, and William B. Fredericks, Asst. Public Defender, Bartow, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and Johnny T. Salgado, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tampa, for appellee.

FULMER, Judge.

The defendant, Rafe Emond, appeals his conviction for possession of cocaine. We address only his contention that probation conditions four, six and seven should be stricken because the trial court did not orally…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. BeasleySupreme Court of Florida · 1991
  2. Nank v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Tomlinson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  4. Hart v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Jennings v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. HartSupreme Court of Florida · 1996
  2. Vasquez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  3. Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
  4. Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995
  5. Bledsoe v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API