Ameritel Management, Inc. v. Tanvir

In an action to recover on a personal guaranty, the defendant appeals from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Baily-Schiffman, J.), dated December 12, 2013, which, after a nonjury trial, and upon the granting of the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of evidence, is in favor the plaintiff and against him in the principal sum of $63,768.65.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly granted the plaintiffs motion pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law made at the close of evidence.…