Legal Opinion

Perine v. Dunn

New York Court of Chancery

Decided September 8, 1819PublishedCited by 28 opinions

THIS cause came before the Court upon exceptions to the Master’s Report, in respect to the amount due to the defendant upon the mortgage which the plaintiff, C, Ferine, wished to redeem. (See S. C. vol. 3. p. 508.)

1Opinion of the Court

The Chancellor

having corrected the report, and determined, upon the facts contained in a special report of the Master, the amount of the principal and interest due upon the bond and mortgage, decreed, that the plaintiffs should *141pay the same, together with the costs of this suit, and certain costs directed to be paid by the former decree of the 28th of September last, within three months, or that the bill stand dismissed with costs. He said it might be proper here to give some explanations on the subject of these allowances of time, made in a decree to redeem or foreclose.

The period of six…

2Cited by28 opinions

  1. Dodge v. GaylordIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Smith v. AuldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1884
  3. Jackson v. LodgeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1868
  4. Badger v. BadgerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1859
  5. Burton v. BurtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1886

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API