Alexandria, Arcadia & Fort Smith Railroad v. Johnson
Supreme Court of Kansas
Error from Atchison district court; R. M. Emery, judge pro te to.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Doster, 0. J.:
This case was once before in this court. (Railroad Co. v. Johnson, 58 Kan. 175, 48 Pac. 847.) Upon the hearing then had it was reversed, with directions for a new trial. Upon that trial a verdict and judgment were rendered in favor of the plaintiff in error, but not in the form satisfactory to it, and it has again prosecuted error to this court.
The material facts are that on the 7th- day of October, 1889, two railroad companies, one called the Alexandria, Arcadia and Fort Smith Railroad Com*418pany, the other the Kansas City, Louisiana and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Pritchard v. NortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- Milliken v. PrattMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1878
- Boyle v. Zacharie & TurnerSupreme Court of the United States · 1832
- Hunter's Adm'r v. Ferguson's Adm'rSupreme Court of Kansas · 1874
- Alexandria, Arcadia & Fort Smith Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1897
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Brown v. BaxterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1908
- Osincup v. HenthornSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
- Anderson v. HeasleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
- Intercontinental Leasing, Inc. v. Chester A. Anderson, M.D.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1969
- Alexander v. BarkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.