Legal Opinion

Bruck Manufacturing Co. v. Mason

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided December 21, 1992No. 63600PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Howard Mason’s two assignments of error lack merit. The trial court did not err in granting the motion for summary judgment filed jointly by new-party plaintiff Brack Manufacturing Company (“Brack”), third-party defendants George and Darryl Brack, and plaintiff Brack Manufacturing Company Employees Profit Sharing Plan & Trust (“Brack Trust”). The trial court, also, properly denied defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The trial court correctly ruled that all claims, including the counterclaim and third-party claim, were disposed of by the bankruptcy court and that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ohio, Department of Taxation v. H.R.P. Auto Center, Inc. (In Re H.R.P. Auto Center, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Ohio · 1991
  2. Carr v. Michigan Real Estate Insurance Trust (In Re Michigan Real Estate Insurance Trust)District Court, E.D. Michigan · 1988
  3. Freedom Ford, Inc. v. Sun Bank & Trust Co. (In Re Freedom Ford, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1992

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Greer-Burger v. TemesiOhio Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Advanced Analytics Laboratories, Inc. v. Kegler, Brown, Hill & Ritter, L.P.A.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2002
  3. In Re LiptakUnited States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2004
  4. Saha v. Research Inst. at Nationwide Children's Hosp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  5. Chrysler Group, L.L.C. v. DixonOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API