Legal Opinion
O'BANNON v. Friedman's, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided June 28, 2006No. Civil Action AW-03-623PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
WILLIAMS, District Court.
Before the Court is a motion for leave to amend a class action complaint filed by John O’Bannon (“O’Bannon”), Sandra Moore (“Moore”), Ronald Hampton (“Hampton”), and Rondall Mitchell (“Mitchell”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) against Friedman’s, Inc. (“Friedman’s” or “Defendant”) alleging racial discrimination in employment under the Civil Rights Act of 1866. Plaintiffs seek to join Federal Insurance Company (“Federal”) and St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company (“St. Paul”) as defendants and to add separate claims against them for declaratory judgments…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Pacific Coal & Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Aetna Casualty & Surety Co. v. QuarlesCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1937
- Nashville, C. & St. LR Co. v. WallaceSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Neuralstem, Inc. v. StemCells, Inc.District Court, D. Maryland · 2008
- Western Heritage Insurance v. LoveDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2014
- Kirschenbaum ex rel. Estate of EMS Financial Services, LLC v. Federal InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2014
- Austin v. Auto Handling CorporationDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2020
- Commerce Insurance Co. v. SzafarowiczMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.