Legal Opinion

Baldi v. City of Philadelphia

Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County

Decided May 18, 1945No. 1133Published

1Opinion of the Court

McDevitt, P. J.,

— This is a case stated in which both the plaintiffs and defendant have agreed upon the facts set forth in the statement of claim.

While much extraneous matter has been injected by defendant in argument, there are three questions to be determined, and the determination of those answers the question of law. They might be set forth as follows:

1. Is section 2 of the Act of April 14,1835, P. L. 232, 61 PS §624, constitutional? It reads as follows:

“The inspectors shall annually appoint a superintendent, a matron for the female department, a physician and a clerk for the institution,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Wilson v. Philadelphia School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  2. Dauphin County Grand Jury Investigation ProceedingsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  3. Poor District Case (No. 1)Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  4. Commonwealth Ex Rel. Kelley v. PommerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938
  5. Girard Trust Co., Trustee's AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API