Legal Opinion · Dissent

Cecil v. Hydorn

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 30, 1987No. 04-85-00046-CVPublished

1DissentCantu, Justice

I register my most vigorous dissent. The facts enumerated in the majority opinion are substantially correct. They are, however, noticeably incomplete.

I write to register my displeasure at the treatment accorded the record through selective recitation of facts constituting the record.

In addition to the facts recited in the majority opinion, it is clear from the appel-lee’s original petition that appellant was alleged to be the president of Evelco Corporation and Reaching Out Corporation and that appellant's address, as well as the two corporate addresses, were one and the same. Appellant…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Copeland v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1968
  2. Burks v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1877
  3. Paul v. Houston Oil Co. of TexasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1948
  4. Starlight Supply Company v. FerisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Lewis v. PittmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1945

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API