Norfolk-Southern Railroad v. Board of Commissioners
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtStacy, J.
In this jurisdiction, a taxpayer may contest the validity of an assessment or collection of tax upon his property in one of two ways:
1. He may pay the alleged illegal or invalid tax under protest and then bring an action to recover it back, observing, of course, the requirements of the statute with respect to time, notice, etc. C. S., 7979; Murdock v. Comrs., 138 N. C., 124; Hilliard v. Asheville, 118 N. C., 845; Schaul v. Charlotte, 118 N. C., 733; Range Co. v. Carver, 118 N. C., 328.
2. He may, if the tax or assessment, or some part thereof, be illegal or invalid, or be levied or assessed…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Seaman v. BowersCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1924
- Purnell v. Page.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
- Hilliard v. City of AshevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Wrought Iron Range Co. v. CarverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
- Sherrod v. . DawsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford CountySupreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1930
- Henrietta Mills v. Rutherford CountyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1929
- Wynn v. . GrantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914