Legal Opinion

Hubbard v. Moore

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided May 15, 1895PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Bill for the dissolution and winding up of a co-partnership and the setting aside of certain conveyances of real estate as in fraud of partnership debts. Heard upon the pleadings and a master’s report, and exceptions by the defendants thereto, atthe December term, 1894, Windsor county.

Read the full summary

Bill for the dissolution and winding up of a co-partnership and the setting aside of certain conveyances of real estate as in fraud of partnership debts. Heard upon the pleadings and a master’s report, and exceptions by the defendants thereto, atthe December term, 1894, Windsor county. Ross, chancellor, overruled the exceptions of the defendants and decreed that the co-partnership be dissolved; that the real estate in question was partnership property; that the conveyance of the same by the defendant, Geo. M., to the defendant, Milton G., was void, and that the same to be annulled and the…

1Opinion of the CourtTyler, J.

It appears by the master’s report that on Dec. 1st, 1888, the negotiations for a co-partnership between the orator and the defendant, George M. Moore, were concluded by the latter’s purchasing of the orator a one-half interest “in the.mills, water privileges, timber lands, stock in the mills, equipment for carrying on the business and the stock in trade.” The purchasing price was five thousand three hundred and ten dollars and eighty-three cents, of which one thousand five hundred and thirty-five dollars and *537eighty-three cents was for the personal property, and three thousand seven hundred…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Rutland Railway, Light & Power Co. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1916
  2. Mears v. DanielsSupreme Court of Vermont · 1911
  3. Jaquith v. SmithSupreme Court of Vermont · 1942
  4. Woolson Bros. v. Fuller & SonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API