Legal Opinion
Guerdon Industries, Inc. v. Rose
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided January 13, 1987No. C5-86-1058PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NIERENGARTEN, Judge.
Appellant Guerdon Industries, Inc. (Guerdon) sued respondent Rose for intentionally interfering with its contract to sell land to another. The trial court found no liability and Guerdon appeals. We affirm.
FACTS
Joseph Rose negotiated to buy some land from Guerdon. A dispute arose over what was included in closing costs and Guerdon notified Rose that the property had been sold to a third party.
Rose sued Guerdon for damages or, in the alternative, specific performance, and filed a lis pendens against the property. Guerdon counterclaimed, alleging Rose intentionally…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Bennett v. Storz Broadcasting Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
- Royal Realty Co. v. LevinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955
- Potthoff v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Rose v. Guerdon Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
3Cited by9 opinions
- Westfield Development Co. v. Rifle Investment AssociatesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1990
- Belliveau Building Corp. v. O'CoinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
- Birdsong v. BydalekMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- HAVILAH REAL PROPERTY SERVICES, LLC v. VLK, LLCDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2015
- Schumacher v. IhrkeCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.