Legal Opinion

Mutual Life Ins. Co. v. Dreeben

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided June 20, 1927No. 3158PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

The spouse of the defendant was insured by the Mutual Life Insurance Company. The insurance was interrupted by failure to pay a premium. The policy contained a reinstatement clause. Among other requisites was the good health of the insured. After the reinstatement the insured died. The policy contained the usual incontestability clause after two years. The beneficiary, the insured’s widow, brought a suit upon the policy and later dismissed it. After its dismissal, and a day or two before two years after its reinstatement had run, the company brought this suit to cancel…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mutual Life Insurance v. Hurni Packing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
  2. American Mills Co. v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
  3. Cable v. United States Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Jefferson Standard Life Ins. v. McIntyreCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1923
  5. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. GalbraithTennessee Supreme Court · 1905

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Brown v. Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1933
  2. New York Life Ins. Co. v. SeymourCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1930
  3. Lincoln Nat. Life Ins. Co. v. HammerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
  4. New York Life Ins. Co. v. TruesdaleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1935
  5. Rosenthal v. New York Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1938

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API